Title：
Comparative Analyses of Universal Extraction Buffers for Assay of Stress Related Biochemical and Physiological Parameters
Authors：
Corresponding
Author：
Chunyu Han, Zhulong Chan and Fan Yang
Pubyear：
2015
Title of
Journal：
Preparative Biochemistry & Biotechnology
Paper
Code：
Volume：
45
Number：
Page：
684–695
Others：
Classification：
Source：
Abstract：
Comparative efficiency of three extraction solutions, including the universal sodium phosphate buffer (USPB), the Tris-HCl buffer (UTHB), and the specific buffers, were compared for assays of soluble protein, free proline, superoxide radical (O2-), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and the antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), guaiacol peroxidase (POD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), and glutathione reductase (GR) in Populus deltoide. Significant differences for protein extraction were detected via sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE). Between the two universal extraction buffers, the USPB showed higher efficiency for extraction of soluble protein, CAT, GR, O2-, GPX, SOD, and free proline, while the UTHB had higher efficiency for extraction of APX, POD, and H2O2. When compared with the specific buffers, the USPB showed higher extraction efficiency for measurement of soluble protein, CAT, GR, and O2-, parallel extraction efficiency for GPX, SOD, free proline, and H2O2, and lower extraction efficiency for APX and POD, whereas the UTHB had higher extraction efficiency for measurement of POD and H2O2. Further comparisons proved that 100mM USPB buffer showed the highest extraction efficiencies. These results indicated that USPB would be suitable and efficient for extraction of soluble protein, CAT, GR, GPX, SOD, H2O2, O2-, and free proline.
Copyright 2002 - 2023 Wuhan Botanical Garden,Chinese Academy Of
Sciences
Email: wbgoffice@wbgcas.cn ICP: 05004779-1
